CIAO PERIMETER PREDECESSORS , WHY ? WELL JUST LIKE THE SPARTANS THAT WOULD RATHER HOLD A PASSAGE THAN FIGHTING FROM ABOVE IT .
DURING THE ASSAULT ON THE GERMAN OCCUPIED BEACHES OF NORTHERN FRANCE AT WORLD WAR TWO . WHY WASN'T THE SIMPLE SHIELD, HAND HELD , USED FOR PROTECTION INSTEAD OF RUNNING BARE WITH JUST A HELMET AND A RIFLE .
AM I MISSING SOMETHING OR DID THE ARMY ELITE NOT THINK OR WANT THIS PROTECTION , SURE THEY WON ANYWAY , BUT AT WHAT COST TO THE SOLDIERS ?
FORGETTING PLANS TO BUILDING A PYRAMID GETTING A LITTLE EASIER THOUGH .
GIANFRANCO FRONZI . MAY / 29 / 2011
2 comments:
I question the same thing. Maybe it was too costly to provide the soldiers with bulletproof shields and other defensive equipment to increase their safety. Kind of says alot about the expendence of humanity.
I thought about it and I betya if the Brass and the politicians were first out of the boats huge bulldozers fitted with bulletproof shields would have been there for them to hide behind. If not bulletproof really really, really, really,thick steel. Ya think?
It was done in the same manner as trench warfare from WWI "OK men climb out of the trench and run as fast as you can into the German machine gun fire."
Go, Go, Go.
Post a Comment